www.CaptainTemerity.com

I write stuff, it's gotta go somewhere
  • Home
  • CapJournal
  • Stories
  • Podcasts
  • About
  • Baujahr!
  • PoT
  • Elsenerds

Moving on

by C. Christian Scott on September 7, 2020 at 9:59 pm
Posted In: Blog, Main

It’s a couple week into this new experiment of writing every day and holding myself accountable. It’s also the end of my holiday weekend. And I spent most of today trying to catch up on sleep, both from staying up too late last night (even extended weekends get their schedules screwed up under my watch) and because we’re expecting rain tonight, so I’ve had sinus headaches all day.

In between, one of the “how does this count as a cable channel” cable channels has been playing what seems to be the entire run of “It’s A Living,” a syndicated show I used to watch in the Eighties. It apparently ran longer than I remembered, and had a lot of interesting guests, including some Star Trek: TNG people before that was a thing. It hit me at the perfect time to be a total energy suck today, both physically and creatively. So I don’t have even the slightest clue as to what this post is going to be.

Oh. Yeah. The thing. The thing where I feel like I need to start over-promising because I’ve barely delivered on what I’ve been doing. Writing-wise.

You see, the trick of doing these daily writings as posts on a journal has been that every day I write anywhere from what seems to be 1200 to just over 3000 words, and then I throw it on my website (which had stagnated for years, after being rebuilt when it had been stagnating before). While I am content to just have these exist in the web app I’ve been writing on, something called Skwerl, which is tracking my daily progress, I was asked by Levi to post some of the things I’d been working on because he used to read my LiveJournal and I guess he enjoyed it or missed something about it. Much like when I get to see what he does in his Sketchbooks every couple of years. While he doesn’t see a lot of his stuff being something a public audience should see, I adore every bit of it that I can sop up with a biscuit. So if he asks me to post my random thought rants, I figure I owe him.

And, as said in the first paragraph up top, it’s about accountability. I don’t expect too many people (if any) to check in on my site on the regular to see what I’m actually writing about each day. But it’s there in case they do, and I’m not making a secret of it. To me it is very much not about “clicks” or “likes” or anything of the sort, although those are always nice to receive. It’s just me getting out of my shell again. Putting myself out there in a way that I’ve been too afraid to do for some time.

But it’s also a bit of a cop-out. Because the diary posts are just ramblings. The one thing I wrote creatively was a nice enough exploration, but it wasn’t a story I had been working on, and i don’t know what or if would come of it if I explored it further (but it’s now out there, so it’s a possibility).

I am, as I’ve said numerous times here over the last couple of weeks, trying to get this project with Levi moving. Trying to get my head back into that spot where I am thinking about story instead of rants is hard. I’ve only been practicing the latter over the last few years, with very minor diversions. The lion’s share of it has been podcasting, but you get to a point where you wind up in conversations over lunch or on the phone with your best friend, and because you podcast somebody says, “Wow, this could be a podcast!”

Note: Everything can be a podcast. Should it? That’s the real conundrum. I guess if you find someone that wants to listen to it then there’s no reason not to. Just don’t expect Casper to sponsor you or for you to go head-to-head with This American Life. I did fake ads off the cuff on one of my shows just because I really want to do podcast ads and no one was ever going to ask me to (not true. We used to have two sponsors for PoT).

I used to play guitar. Before that, I used to write song lyrics. Getting the two things to meet up never quite clicked for me. One, because I was always pretty shit at the guitar. But also, by the time I started working on the muscles it took to do one type of project, the ones I used to have for the other just instantly seemed to atrophy. Or it’s more likely that was my interests. But those two things go together more than most other things that have sidelined me over the years.

My friend J-F is an incredible writer. And he’s sure as shit fun to listen to on a podcast. But he managed to turn his writing into a show with our other friend Amy (who is also incredible, in about a billion ways). J-F managed, with Amy, to turn his writing and their podcasting skills into a phenomenal show.

I am not sure why I struggle with the things that I do to make something that makes sense in my head as a thing I’d both love doing and maybe be kind of good at. I talked recently about my voice in writing, finding my style. I had been playing at trying to do an actual blog because the conversational tone I have here and in my podcasts made sense. But my blogs, like most things I write or talk about, wind up all over the place. I have hard time reeling my mind and my mouth into a controllable entity. My brain is like ping-pong balls or pinballs, just bouncing around, getting struck from all sides by random thoughts and whatever is shiny or on fire, and containing the thoughts and tying them up with a flourish and some cohesiveness is just not my strong suit. Way back in the Prodigy days, a friend who was involved in a lot of the stuff I was writing (and vice-versa) said something along the lines of, “You use words in weird ways. I always get what it is that you mean, but it’s not like you’re using them correctly. Just the context works.” Which is a nice way of saying that I often probably don’t know exactly what the hell I’m talking about. Super nice. Practically candy-coated.

ADHD or other aspects of it were around and starting to be treated when I was still young, but nothing i was ever tested for. Looking back, I showed a lot of the signs (I think, but this is totally a self-diagnosis). As an adult, seeing how prevalent those things are in my family, both after me and before me, and other stuff like Asperger’s and such, maybe I would’ve benefited from some treatment for it, or at least some therapy to see what amount of it I might have. But that’s okay. At most, people think I’m weird. I’m nice, I’m funny, it hasn’t kept me from having fantastic friendships. Hasn’t kept me from anything really. But as I look at myself, I wonder, you know?

One of the reasons I write is because I love story. One of the reasons I struggle to read, even though I love books, is because my head gets cloudy and I wind up coming out of the story into something of my own making. Or these days my eyes have as much a hard time focusing as my brain does. I’m sitting in front of a 27″ screen right now and the text is pretty large, but my eyes are blurry because I’ve gone between staring at my phone or my TV most of the evening, and my astigmatism tunes to one thing and back slowly. One of the last times I had my eyes tested, my prescription changed drastically right in the seat. The doctor was writing it up one way, checked me one more time, and I could no longer see through the lenses as he’d set them up. He was surprised, and I… just felt like that’s how it had always worked. Why was I 45 and just now getting validation on this thing I’d lived with for so long?

See? Digressing. I was talking about my brain, not my eyes.

A lot of the stories I enjoy writing the most contain at least one character that just embodies chaos. Just the proverbial monkey-wrench, walking around, messing shit up. Not to be a dick (not always). Just because that’s what they bring to the table. It is probably the most “Me” character in those stories too. Is it a crutch? Sure. But it’s just fun, and I like writing what’s fun.

I think why I like writing dialog and not writing descriptives is because I don’t look too closely at things. I get the general gist of the worlds around me, but my focus is on feelings and words, not on looks and smells and more tangible stuff. Detailed writing is too clinical for me. Feels like a job. Or school work. And we know how I did with school.

But writing IS work. Telling stories IS hard. If you want to do it well. If you want to do it right. If you want to give the reader your best.

And I do want to do that. Whatever my best is, I can’t rightly say. Other than a couple of lucky sparks here and there, I don’t know that I’ve achieved what my best is simply because I finish something (when I finish something) and I move along. Or sure, long, terrifyingly uneventful gaps between the times I write something. But in that time I don’t really go back and improve the old stuff. I just keep looking for the new shining, burning thing.

As of today, it’s been just over two weeks (if I do the math. But I’m not) of me writing every day, that couple of thousand words on average, and it’s been stuff like this. Just mental vomit. Not making story. Not trying too hard. Not even spell-checking most of the time. Write. Complete. Post. And there’s value to it because a lot of what I’ve been needing to work on is just doing those three things. I think the lowest one being addressed is the completion part simply because these are just random thoughts, so they don’t really have a structure to have to reach an ending. I just trail off.

It’s easy. I can tell it’s easy because the hardest part is, and has pretty much been for the last fifteen years, getting up here, sitting down, and starting. It’s the equivalent of when your alarm goes off in the morning, do you hit snooze a bunch of times, or call in because you’re just not feeling it that day. Or do you get up, go get in the shower, and motivate your ass forward. Because once you’re in motion, things just kind of keep moving and you survive. You get through the days, most of them unscathed, although some are particular hard, and others can be particularly easy or fun. But it mostly evens out. The biggest part is you have to Get Up, Go, and Do.

The hard part, or one of the hard parts. Let’s just say the next hard part. That’s going to be taking away the crutch of writing these diary entries. At least every day. It’s either doing more drabbles or going into full-on stories.

Oh, and I might be using “drabble” wrong. My friend Anne was the person who introduced me to the term. Wikipedia says:

A drabble is a short work of fiction of precisely one hundred words in length. The purpose of the drabble is brevity, testing the author’s ability to express interesting and meaningful ideas in a confined space.

I don’t know if that story about Little Byrd and her grandmother counts or not. It was just… a scene. I don’t know what it added up to. But I enjoyed writing it. A drabble, if that qualifies, still doesn’t feel much like work. I guess the real work would be writing on either side of it. What comes before or after? What is the story beyond the scene. But even taking that into account, a drabble is a workout for me, and something I’m going to try to be more consciously doing. I should, honestly, put myself on a schedule. One a week or two weeks. I want to make a goal that’s achievable enough that I don’t clam up and talk myself out of doing anything because I miss my deadlines. A few years back I put myself into writing 5k words a week. Seems low, but I think it was story, not chatter, and it was about a certain story at that. I did okay, but without the accountability part, I dropped it.

Which is scary. If I write and it’s not drabbling (auto-correct is having a field day with me right now), but parts to something bigger… I don’t know if I’m doing the “Open Door Writing” thing yet, or at all. Some stuff, like the comic, I want to hold back strictly because it’s not fair to put it out there without Levi’s art attached. So I’d be doing my daily writing, but not my daily posting. Achieving something only I can see puts the pressure on me even more to keep it up. So I’m intimidated by the idea.

But it makes sense that it’s the next step. Am I taking that step too soon though? I haven’t quite worked out all the terrain. Things are slippery and treacherous. Also there’s no pull to any one thing. My brain is still all over the place. If I can’t make the comic work yet, and I’m more aggravated about being stuck on it than I even make it sound here, what is the other thing I attack? Old stuff? I don’t know that i have much going for ideas for new stuff.

I’m talking myself out of it. Things are good right now, I want to allow them to stay good. To stay achievable.

But it’s late, and my head still hurts, and work is in the morning, and I have a few more chores before I need to go to bed. So I’m not going to make a promise one way or another tonight. I will think on it tonight, and through my work day tomorrow. Maybe the rest of the week. I guess if you see me still posting CapJournal stuff, then I’ve not moved on yet.

It’s coming though. One way or another. It has to.

 Comment 

“Scrape ’em off, Claire.”

by C. Christian Scott on September 6, 2020 at 11:10 pm
Posted In: Blog, Main

As I am trying to build myself towards a better place, writing-wise, but I’m also pretty sure it’s an overall mental health push as well to make that even happen, I am looking more and more at social media, in one part, and the internet overall. How does it affect me? Why is it this way? Why have I allowed my experiences to be like they are there.

The great thing about the internet, really, is that like many things, it’s a choice if you use it. But that choice is becoming less of one all the time. I remember at my Big Electronics Retailer job when we stopped having paper applications at all to hand out for people looking to get hired. We forced them to go online to do it. Now, we had computer stations all over the store where someone could do that. But it was a big deal. I lived in a very tech-centric area of Norther California, and my store was literally a five to ten minute drive to the Golden Gate Bridge, right into San Francisco where Big Tech was king (and still is, but it’s pretty much choked the live out of everything else). My store was also right at the entry into some of the poorer urban neighborhoods though, and not all of those young adults just looking to get into the workforce for the first time, and some older adults who were maybe trying to find new jobs after the Tech Bubble burst so recently, had the access to computers at home. Or broadband internet. Or any number of other things.

Sure, we were a tech-oriented store, so maybe the expectation was to possibly weed out some people that weren’t accustomed to using it. But geez, even then I felt like it was somehow being used as an entrance barrier to poorer communities and people of color. Fortunately, we were still lucky enough to have a very diverse employee base at my store, and for most of us that was incredibly important and something we wanted to flourish. But then when my General Manager left, and we got a new one in… He seemed to go in the other direction. I saw some first-hand racism from that guy. And while I felt like I was on his target list to some degree myself, it was nothing in comparison to some of the people I worked with.

I’m a white guy (surprise!) and I had longer hair at the time. It was always clean, sure, but I wore it down most of the time. It got a bit messy. This manager, who was not my favorite person, never said shit to me about it. But to a young black gentleman I worked with who had braids in his hair, and I mean tight, well-maintained, frankly beautifully done braids, the manager told him that he looked unprofessional. The cost and maintenance that went into his hair verses mine was incomparable, and we actually talked about it. I don’t know if he ever did, but I called Human Resources on that manager, for that incident and several others. I know I wasn’t the only one, but I’m happy to say that, even though I left the store before he did, the manager left the company soon after.

Back to the internet.

Facebook isn’t the internet, but for a lot of people it might as well be. I recently ranted here about my issues with the Share button, and I think maybe I could refine some of that. I also mentioned the issue of someone posting some stupid shit about a famous comic creator on Twitter.

Today, an internet friend of mine posted to an article about that Twitter statement, and basically agreed with them. Said they weren’t speaking any lies, as it were. Who wouldn’t trade having Chadwick Boseman being alive and having this other person… not.

Having a random asshole say something like that on the internet is already pretty disgusting to me and makes me question the level of humanity that exists in this world today. Having someone else that I genuinely like, and normally think highly of, echoing that statement. That hurts.

But like I said before, I think the internet, and by that I mostly mean social media sites like Facebook and Twitter, being the snarky, smart-ass, “talk shit to get noticed, any attention is good attention in the end” attitude-having entity that it is, it causes people to just lean into stupid shit.

I’ve done it. I like to think it’s been a long while, but it probably hasn’t. Certainly not long enough. And I can think of things I have said, or thought about saying, and fully intended them to be looked at strictly as jokes. Me having no real intent behind them. Certainly not me wanting to hurt anyone. But callousness isn’t comedy (unless you’re Anthony Jesselneck, and I’m sorry, but that guy is hilarious!). Cruelty even less so.

Being funny though, and getting attention, is hard. Being someone that wants to be seen on the internet I have to assume is way, way harder. There are people that do it with genuine talent. There are people who do it by copying others they’ve seen. There are also people who do it by being the loudest asshole around. If you’re pissing people off, congratulations! You’re winning!

It’s an odd scoreboard that. And, for me, I don’t know what that winning actually equates to.

So I recently had it out with someone that has been a family friend of mine for forty years or so. We were kids together. His adoptive mother was best friends with my grandmother. We were neighbors. We hung out a lot as kids. Less so as we got older. I guess when I got on Facebook, some of his family was already friends with my family, and we added each other.

Politically, we are now polar opposites. And for a while, I thought that would be okay.

But over time, I saw that he was in the same position that I experience a lot from others on his side of the political line. And I’m going to be totally honest here… The people on my side do it too, I’m sure of it. I just am not the target of it, so I haven’t experienced it. I’m not saying a side is better, or a side is worse, although I obviously align more with mine than the other (which goes back to me talking about letting too many people into your circle).

What I saw though was that it wasn’t enough for disagreements. It wasn’t enough to say, “That’s not how I see it,” or even, “That’s not how it is.”

It was insults. It was lies. It was sending me instant messages (which is why I don’t have an instant messenger app on my phone), trying to show me articles from dubious sites and propaganda that fit his world view and opposed mine, and be like, “See? You see this? Argue with this! Argue with me! Validate me with your discourse!”

And I didn’t. I wouldn’t. It wasn’t worth my time or effort. But he would show up on my wall and try to start arguments, and I’d tease him, sometimes reprimand him. But then he’d get into it with my friends. My real friends. The people who have been there for me the last twenty years or more. And that would put me at a more defensive level, and then a more aggressive level. But I still maintained that he was just being an asshole, but we had history, and shared family, so I couldn’t just let that go.

It was pretty selfish. Of me. I should’ve seen it sooner. That I didn’t I completely know is a personal failing of mine. It’s part of what I’m trying to work on.

This past week, again, a former family friend who I found on Facebook, but also is on the other side of the political thinkspeak from me, she and someone who is an old work friend had an exchange on one of my posts. And I let it ride at first because, in the first bits, it wasn’t out of line. But then the old friend went to “Stop trolling and get a life” to the other person. And I told her, “Hey. Not here. It’s not cool.” She unfriended me later, probably blocked me from what I can tell unless she legitimately close her Facebook account. I’m hoping the former, as someone who has cared about her for a long time, because I don’t want to feel like I in any way chased her off of the platform. I shouldn’t have that kind of power over her or anyone. But I’m seeing a lot of people lately close their accounts, either deactivating to get through these very volatile times, or outright deleting the things entirely because Facebook is part of the fucking problem and shows no real remorse or intention of implementing real change.

I’m considering it too.

But I won’t, simply because for many of the people that I do want to still have in my life, even if only on a website that is more memes than it is human interaction, I can’t walk away from this thing unless they all pick a new place we are comfortable being at instead.

I just don’t know that any new platform is going to be able to do things any differently. If it’s too restrictive, most people won’t go. We like things easy. We like things to feel the same. And if it’s any looser on the rules, it’s already going to be a place I can’t invest in.

So two friends down. I have to see how today’s interaction goes over. I made my piece when I saw the post. I said, “This isn’t really okay with me,” or something to that effect. But I didn’t go beyond that. I’m not gonna curse the guy out or outright “cancel” him. If this becomes the content he wants to post going forward, I’ll quietly take my leave. It’ll suck of course, because I really do like the guy. And I don’t think this post is representative of who he is at all.

But it’s fucking Facebook.

One of the things I’m doing now is giving myself breaks from things that are just not gelling with where my head is at. So I Snooze people a lot. “Don’t see posts from this person for 30 days.” That works. In 30 days time, if they pop back up and I feel like it’s still not a great situation, I can do it again. I also hide as many Meme factory pages as I can. Because I fucking hate that culture. It’s not to say that I’ve never found a meme creative, or funny, or that i haven’t reposted them myself. Of course I have. But the farms are just garbage. They don’t believe in anything, they don’t hold anything of value. They often rip off their “content” from other sites, someone else’s Twitter feed, or reuse the original idea with a blatant paste of barely altered text. It’s bottom-feeding swill most of the time, and that’s the kindest thing I can say about it. So I block it. I have a couple of friend who, that’s all the do is repost memes. And they’re funny, intelligent people with valuable things to say. But it’s how they choose to use their profiles. I can’t tell them not to. But sometimes, I’ll take a break from them. People who just post political stuff right now too. I’ll block the pages and snooze the person. I’m not permanently cutting them out of my life, but I’m giving my consciousness a break.

A few others I’ve done the Unfollow. We’re friends, but 30 days isn’t enough, I know your posts are always going to bug me. Sometimes I have to think, Are We Friends Though? Why is this person taking up space in my brain at all? It depends on the situation, and I’m not someone to just write someone off without a really solid reason.

But I’m learning to be more critical. If not for me, then for the people I care about. Does this person need access to my friends and family through me? Does this person need to believe that their message has support simply because I haven’t publicly ousted them and their opinions from my life completely. People use the word “complicit” a lot these days. Like everything, there are different levels of it. Not everything needs to be or should be weighed the same. But while I wouldn’t point at someone else and tell them they need to be making the hard decisions with the people they’re friends with online, because it’s not my job and it’s not my right… I can and should be doing a better job with and for myself.

I have a YouTube subscription (I was an early adopter to Google Music, which YouTube has royally fucked up, but paying more to move to a different music subscription would suck out loud and then I’d also have to start seeing ads on YouTube proper, so I’m sticking it out). I do like to play music videos and find other things on the site. Lately as I’ve been working from home, I’ve been watching a lot of videos about people who are making webcomics. Tutorials, interviews, just that kind of thing. And then you see the list of videos that YouTube recommends to you and if you have Autoplay on (I normally don’t), it’ll lead you down it’s algorithmic pathway to some stupid and dark shit if you let it.

A lot of recommendations I see are the “Top Five” lists. E! Channel-lite garbage. But then it’s a bunch of videos that are the next level. “Everything Wrong With This Movie In Twenty Minutes Or Less,” or “Why the songs in the Aladdin remake are so terrible!”

I get it. I review horror movies on a podcast. Sometimes it really does come down to us talking about how bad a movie was. I have been looking at myself when it comes to that, and I don’t love it. Because people don’t set out to make shitty films. It’s too much work and too much money and too much on their ability to get their next job to just want to fail. Sometimes bad isn’t bad. Sometimes it’s just missing the mark. Low budget, bad effects, inexperienced actors or directors. And really, if I’m not making stuff and allowing it to be judge by others (which is still my goal), how much can I say?

I do think I’m beyond doing a site that is built around “Here’s where we talk about how bad the new Star Wars sucks” followed by “Here’s where we talk about how the new Marvel film sucks” followed by “Here’s where we talk about how everything DC has done has sucked.” Siskel and Ebert gave plenty of thumbs down, but if it was the only score they ever gave, I don’t think people would’ve felt the need to tune in every week for their next reviews.

So I noticed the three dots by the title of a video that’s on the coming-up list allowed you to choose “Not Interested.” And I finally started using that. It’s hidden, which is annoying. What I used to love about Pandora, the music streaming service, was the simple “Thumbs Up/Thumbs Down.” And then the deeper, should you need it, “Never play this artist/band.” It only seemed to work on one channel at a time. I hated that no matter what the original intended music was for a new channel I created, be it Dean Martin or De Bussy, Pandora would inevitably wind up throwing Red Hot Chili Peppers onto it and I’d scream bloody murder and punch in the NEVER-THE-FUCK-AGAIN button as quickly as I could.

(See? I can still talk some shit. Comfortably.)

Facebook and YouTube/Google have what they consider to be some incredible display of A.I. in their mystical “algorithms” that is the basis for their interface redesigns and their ad networks and how they crap all over why you can’t have and shouldn’t even want a chronological timeline for your feeds. I’ve worked endlessly for years to get Google to understand that I don’t want to see stories related to Sports ever, at all, not even a little bit, on my News Feed, but it still somehow assumes that because I’m in proximity of some fucking arena, here’s what happened there last night.

The only reason these algorithms exist, I believe, is so they can say that it’s imperative to their business that no one knows the ingredients in the cheese, as it were. “Don’t look at what we’re doing. It’s private, lock-stock-and-laptop.” But all the really want is to be able to play by their own rules without oversight. Facebook will sell you ads and then tell you if they were successful or not. Not with numbers, just with large invoices. It’s the Emperor’s New SEOs.

That said though, many people just don’t do anything to take control of their feeds and streams. And that’s ideal for these companies. That’s why Likes and Dislikes and Rankings are more and more hidden. Netflix doesn’t care any more if you Thumbs Down their new Adam Sandler movie. Because they have so much other shit on there, you’ll probably never see the stuff you really want, but they stuff they made is front and center so choke on it.

Minor tools have minor power. But we should use the ones that we have. And if we curate and define and tailor our experiences, find-tuning it the best we possibly can, and get rid of the hate mongers and the shit-talkers (except me. I’m your friend) and the crap ads with ad blockers, and realign our feeds into order with Social Fixer…

If we do all that, and then the whole thing still feels like shit any time we log in?

Maybe we’ll figure it all out. And leave.

And, I don’t know, go to MeWe or something.

 Comment 

Doctor’s orders

by C. Christian Scott on September 5, 2020 at 11:13 pm
Posted In: Blog, Main

Erin and I just got done watching “Doctor Sleep.” It took us two nights because we watched the Director’s Cut and, at three hours, it was a little much for her to sit through last night.

Her final review was basically along the lines of, “It’s good. Not sure if I’ll watch it again.”

Erin watches Horror movies non-stop. Well, no. That was true up until a few months ago, and then she started listening to True Crime podcasts, except they’re all on YouTube, so there’s a video component, even if most of it just some someone sitting there talking into a camera. As an audio podcaster who has that same component on our YouTube channel, I don’t really know what it counts for. But I can’t get her to do audio podcasts, which bums me out because that’s most of what I know to recommend. But at least she’s found something she likes.

Back to Doctor Sleep though.

I am not a Kubrick fan. As a film “reviewer” I know that’s a pretty high level of blasphemy, right up there with me not caring for Scorsese or, I don’t know, Coppola or whoever. It’s probably more the content of the movies than the directing. I don’t like mob/mafia movies, so Scorsese is pretty much out of my wheelhouse. And Kubrick always gets billed as a genius and I’m constantly wondering why.

And nothing stirs up more misguided genius talk than The Shining.

I never read King’s book. I haven’t seen the closer-to-it adaptation that ABC did with Stephen Webber either. So I am not comparing the original film to the source material.

I’ve seen The Shining now a few times. Like I said, Erin watches horror movies a lot, and some of them she basically has on repeat. She is a Kubrick fan, to hear her talk. I’ve heard her say it in regards to The Shining, Full Metal Jacket, and maybe A Clockwork Orange, but I could be wrong on the last one. I don’t know what else the guy did that she likes. Doctor Strangelove is probably the most my speed from his lists of work. I saw Eyes Wide Shut in the theater and felt like it was the world’s longest con job of what a movie should be. I honestly have more affection for A.I. more than anything and he was just the concept on that, right, before it went to Spielberg? I don’t know.

But what I do know is that there about 50 or so hardcore theories about what Kubrick did with The Shining film, and how if any single one of them is right AT ALL, then it completely destroys all the other theories. They have absolutely no standing. It’s like backmasking a Beatles album and hearing “I Killed Paul” as clear as mud and coming up with a conspiracy out of it. Paul is dead. Michael Jackson was replaced by a white guy. Beyonce is part of the Illuminati.

What kind of gets to me is that Stephen King hated the movie. Because I guess it and the book differed a lot. But King… What do you do if you’re him? Here is the most successful adaptation of your work, that probably put you on people’s radars in a bigger way than anything else had. You had Carrie and then the TV two-parter of Salem’s Lot. I seem to remember that Kubrick’s Shining was a flop, right? And then, over time, it got seen as genius. Kind of like I see Maximum Overdrive as a work of genius. Fucked up, coked out of it’s mind genius, but, for my money, a much more enjoyable film.

Erin asked me if King had anything to do with Doctor Sleep. Did he write it, did he direct it? I said he wrote the book. And she told me that she tried reading his Shining novel and only got so far into it because it was so different from the movie she already loved. And I get that. But I wonder, and I’ll have to ask Levi because he actually reads King’s stuff, if Doctor Sleep the novel is as reverent to the Kubrick film as Doctor Sleep the movie is. Because the movie really has to walk a line, right? As popular a writer King is, I’ve gotta imagine a lot more people saw the flicks than read either of the books. It’s just the way of things.

When it comes to King, as a teenager I read “The Eyes of the Dragon.” Everyone I ever told that to said, “Oh, that’s different from all his other stuff!” And then they’d spout a list of the books I should read. When I first moved to California, I started reading “The Gunslinger” which is the first Dark Tower book. I got… most of the way, I think, and then set it down and never picked it back up again. The only other book I’ve gotten through of King’s is “On Writing.” Which, great though it is, is a strange thing, me reading a book (partly) about writing by a writer I haven’t read all that much of. I enjoyed “On Writing” a lot. I think I remember liking “Eyes of the Dragon,” but that was thirty years ago. And all I can remember of “The Gunslinger” was that someone was playing a Beatles song on an old-style piano in a saloon.

Maybe it was being played backwards.

So I wonder, if King knows the audience is broader for the movie that, he feels at least, was disrespectful to the book it was based on, how does he approach a sequel that everyone is going to expect to be like the film? Does he suck it up and write scenes that describe the carpet in the Overlook Hotel in great detail? Does he mention the use of “red” and what the symbolism meant according to some crackpot on the internet (not me this time)?

This movie, the Director’s Cut of it I should say again, does that. Leans into it hard. And i both loved it and hated it.

The story for the most part was about a young girl, some spiritual vampires, and then Danny Torrence was in it. But not Danny in any way that we’d know if not for the flashbacks they kept throwing our way. It was Danny by way of Trainspotting, in the beginning at least, which makes sense because of who they cast in the part. But it felt like all the stuff dealing with The Shining was just window-dressing that, which one part fascinating in seeing how they used new actors in those familiar roles, it could have and probably should have all been chopped up like Scatman Crothers in the original.

Side note though: Carl Lumbly as Dick Hallorann and Alex Essoe as Wendy Torrence were just phenomenal. You want to do an homage to the actors in the original movie, they were the right way to go, absolutely. I wasn’t quite as taken with The Bartender, although holy shit, that was Henry Thomas I am just finding out! Insane!

Anyway, the story about Abra and the soul-suckers felt very similar to The Outsider, which was a mini-series HBO did this year based off of another King book, so that makes sense. Certain scenes that happened in this one, like the one in the woods, felt like I was watching a reflection of the other. Also the relationship between Abra and Dan reminded me of the one with Holly and Ralph. None of that is a complaint because the relationships between the characters were my favorite parts. But we know King has tropes (as much as he writes, he’d have to). Its just something to see them so clearly.

So without The Shining to give it the additional flavor of the familiar, I think Doctor Sleep had a better story in there that just didn’t get to be its own. If it had been focused more completely on Abra and maybe other kids like her, we would’ve been closer to “IT” territory, which may have meant it didn’t get made at all because “IT” has been coming out the same time.

But this isn’t a review so much as a curiosity.

King has to please the audience. Which, as a writer, I don’t know if is something he considers himself loathe to do necessarily. But I know he must hate that he has to embrace the film he talked so much shit about. And I don’t blame him for talking shit. I really don’t. You make something, you put it in someone else’s hands to move it to another medium, but you are allowed to have expectations. You can’t do jack about it, mind you, but you created the art. What other people do with it, yes, it’s bound to lose some recognition to the original thing. But being far and away from what you created has got to be annoying. And even more annoying when, over time, it starts to outshine what you did.

So how does King feel about Doctor Sleep? His book and then the film? He’s been having a real resurgence recently with movies and TV (or streaming). Nothing wrong with having success. I just wonder is the success seen that way when you have to also invite what you didn’t love to enjoy with you.

There’s probably interviews online that I could go look at about all this. But I’m content to let my mind wander.

I don’t hold a lot precious myself. But then, I’ve had no real success with anything I’ve made. So it’s easier for me. That said, the comic (for lack of other things I could throw at into being the sacrifice) that I’m trying to work on holds a lot of importance to me. For one, I want it to be an all-ages book. And two, the characters really are kind of fixed in my head. If Levi and I were approached to put it into a film or cartoon (as I’ve mentioned previously, the far-reaching dream) and those elements were changed in particular, I think I’d feel pretty unhappy with it. I’m not on some moral high ground about respecting my original work and intents. It’s just… at a point, it becomes, “Why buy this property if you don’t see and believe in what it is enough to make it this way?” And this is an issue I’ve taken with certain superhero movies and other stuff where it gets less and less “right” (that’s an opinion, mine, and not a certainty) and instead just wants to use the recognizable name or imagery to do something else far from what the original thing was. And I’m normally pretty vocal about my feelings when it comes to stuff like that. You want to do a Spider-Man film where he’s African American or Latino or something? I’m down. You want to do a Spider-Man movie where he outright kills his foes? No. That goes against everything I know the character to be. If the heart and the heroism isn’t there, why do it at all?

But that’s me. A “no one is knocking on my door to buy my ideas” version of me. Someone shows up with a check and a lot of zeroes before the decimal point… Who knows. I would like to buy my house. I would like to see a dentist again some day.

I’m not pointing at King for giving the audience what they expected (if that’s what happened). Like I said, I’m just curious. Because I wonder, if it came down to it, what I would do.

 Comment 
  • Page 10 of 21
  • « First
  • «
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • »
  • Last »

©2014-2023 C. Christian Scott | Powered by WordPress with ComicPress | Subscribe: RSS | Back to Top ↑